According to the case file, on November 19, 2019, Do The M., a collaborator at B Insurance Co., Ltd., was not authorized to provide consulting or collect premiums from client Nguyen Ngoc A. However, M. nonetheless posed as an authorized representative, issued the company’s official receipt, and collected over VND 16 million from Mr. A.
M. then forged documents, including a “request to change policy details” and a “policy reinstatement form,” submitting VND 4 million to the company while embezzling the remaining VND 12 million.

Later, from October 2020 to 2022, despite having been dismissed from the company, M. continued pretending to be an insurance agent. He approached Mr. A. again, collecting more than VND 46 million in supposed annual premium payments, which he spent for personal use.
The prosecution charged M. with both “Abuse of trust to appropriate property” (Article 175(1)(a) of the 2015 Penal Code) and “Fraudulent appropriation of property” (Article 174(1) of the same code).
During trial, the prosecutor proposed a 30–36 month prison term and required M. to compensate Mr. A. over VND 46 million and the company more than VND 12 million.
The panel determined that M. had deliberately falsified insurance documents to steal company funds, satisfying all elements of abuse of trust. Furthermore, his later acts of impersonating an insurance agent and defrauding Mr. A. met the criteria for fraudulent appropriation of property.
All witness statements, physical evidence, and investigative documents corroborated M.’s confession, confirming that the prosecution’s charges were legally grounded and correctly identified the crimes.
The court stressed that M.’s actions were socially dangerous, violating others’ property rights and undermining public trust in the insurance industry. Despite having legal knowledge, M. acted out of greed and showed disregard for the law.
He had already been serving a 12-year prison sentence imposed by the People’s Court of Tay Ho District, Hanoi, for unrelated crimes committed later. Although the current case did not count as a prior conviction, it reflected his persistent disregard for the law.
Given that M. committed fraud multiple times, the court applied the aggravating factor under Article 52(1)(g) of the Penal Code. However, he was given some leniency for his truthful confession and remorse.
The court sentenced M. to:
12 months’ imprisonment for abuse of trust to appropriate property;
24 months’ imprisonment for fraudulent appropriation of property.
The total combined sentence was 3 years in prison, which, when added to his previous 12-year sentence, resulted in a total of 15 years of imprisonment.
M. was also ordered to repay over VND 46 million to Mr. A. and more than VND 12 million to B Insurance Co., Ltd.
Ý kiến bạn đọc
Những tin mới hơn
Những tin cũ hơn
Cô Cindy Lê hiện đảm nhiệm vai trò Giám đốc Phát triển Chiến lược Quốc tế tại Công ty Luật Nguyễn, một vị trí mang tính then chốt trong việc dẫn dắt các doanh nghiệp Việt Nam mở rộng quy mô và vị thế trên thị trường toàn cầu. Với tư duy chiến lược sắc sảo, kinh nghiệm thực chiến đa ngành, và khả...
Chủ Trọ Có Thể Bị Phạt Đến 12 Triệu Nếu Không Khai Báo Lưu Trú
Bỏ thuế khoán: Đề xuất mới về kê khai thuế hộ kinh doanh
Bộ Chính trị ra Chỉ thị tăng cường lãnh đạo giám định tư pháp, định giá tài sản
Lý do không áp dụng biểu thuế cho kỳ tính thuế năm 2025
Biểu thuế TNCN 5 bậc, thuế suất 35%: Đã tối ưu cho người lao động?
Khởi tố Đoàn Văn Sáng vì tội giết người ở Lạng Sơn
Quỹ Phòng chống thiên tai đối với Doanh nghiệp.Bắt buộc hay Tự nguyện?
SJC gold price soars to nearly VND 133 million/tael, $900 premium over global market
Gold price gap between SJC and global market narrows by VND 6 million
Foreigners Seeking a Vietnamese Driver’s License: What You Must Meet