Many companies have recently fallen victim to online smear campaigns. In such cases, instead of engaging emotionally or responding on social media, the proper and sustainable solution is to pursue legal remedies such as lawsuits, administrative complaints, or criminal reports.
Civil lawsuits and compensation claims
Under Vietnam’s Civil Code 2015, legal entities whose reputation or honor is infringed have the right to file lawsuits in court. Businesses can demand corrections, public apologies, and compensation for damages. Strong evidence, often notarized by bailiffs, is crucial. Economic loss and reputational harm are also key grounds for compensation.

This approach shows respect for the law and avoids perceptions that large businesses are abusing their power to silence critics.
Administrative measures
Enterprises may submit complaints to specialized authorities such as the Department of Information and Communications or the Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information. Under the Cybersecurity Law, Decree 15/2020, and Decree 14/2022, individuals spreading false information can face fines from 10 to 15 million VND and be forced to remove the content.
Criminal proceedings for serious cases
If the defamation is organized and causes severe harm, businesses may file reports with investigative agencies. Violators can be prosecuted for “defamation” (Article 156 of the Penal Code) or “abuse of democratic freedoms” (Article 331). However, criminal cases usually require lengthy investigations and trials, so businesses should evaluate carefully.
International practices
Globally, many jurisdictions enforce strong protections. The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) obliges tech platforms to remove false information. Singapore’s POFMA law allows authorities to issue correction and takedown orders. In China, companies like Tesla and BYD have successfully sued individuals spreading fabricated claims, securing public apologies and compensation.
Case studies in Vietnam
Vietnamese courts have also recognized corporate victims of online defamation. In 2022, the People’s Court of An Nhon (Binh Dinh) ordered a Facebook user to apologize and compensate a local business. In 2025, the People’s Court of Thu Duc City sentenced Trương Thanh Tịnh (Mr. Lee) to nine months in prison for posting false and defamatory content that damaged a company and its owner.
Conclusion
In the complex digital era, legal action is the most effective tool for businesses to protect themselves. Beyond safeguarding their interests, companies help set standards for a more transparent and civil online environment, ensuring fair competition and accountability under the law.
Ý kiến bạn đọc
Những tin mới hơn
Những tin cũ hơn
Nền tảng khác biệt: Từ môi trường quốc tế đến đam mê pháp luật Không đi theo con đường truyền thống, Minh Quân đã được tiếp xúc với môi trường học tập quốc tế từ nhỏ tại trường Quốc tế Á Châu (AIS). Điều này không chỉ giúp Quân trau dồi khả năng tiếng Anh một cách vượt trội mà còn hình...
Bỏ thuế khoán: Đề xuất mới về kê khai thuế hộ kinh doanh
Bộ Chính trị ra Chỉ thị tăng cường lãnh đạo giám định tư pháp, định giá tài sản
Lý do không áp dụng biểu thuế cho kỳ tính thuế năm 2025
Biểu thuế TNCN 5 bậc, thuế suất 35%: Đã tối ưu cho người lao động?
Ngành Thuế Ra Mắt Công Cụ Tự Kê Khai Trực Tuyến
Khởi tố Đoàn Văn Sáng vì tội giết người ở Lạng Sơn
Quỹ Phòng chống thiên tai đối với Doanh nghiệp.Bắt buộc hay Tự nguyện?
SJC gold price soars to nearly VND 133 million/tael, $900 premium over global market
Gold price gap between SJC and global market narrows by VND 6 million
Foreigners Seeking a Vietnamese Driver’s License: What You Must Meet